by complicated i mean a single model that can't be put together with
functions, macros, or randomization.  trees, grass etc. are complicated,
but i don't think of them as the same kind of models.  to me they are
more like environmental constructs (which make the surroundings of where
a model goes).  clouds and skies are another example of things that are
complicated, but don't fit into my personal view of a model.  of course,
anyone that can make any of the above items realistically, has praise
from me.

Warp wrote:
> 
> ryan constantine <rco### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> : but for anything complicated, a modeller is the only
> : way to go.
> 
>   Well, it depends on your definition of "complicated".
>   For complicated generation of objects (trees, grass, galaxies...) modellers
> are not very good unless they specifically support those.
> 
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message